We all derived great mirth last week from Donald Trump’s ritual humiliation of Australia’s former Prime Minister, Kevin Sandwichgate Rudd.
You can actually pinpoint the second when Kevin Rudd’s heart gets ripped in half by President Trump. pic.twitter.com/T258AC04cF
— Australians vs. The Agenda (@ausvstheagenda) October 20, 2025
Meanwhile, the substance of the press conference represents a crucial decision which will determine Australia’s path for the 21st century.
From the Dinosaur Media:
Australia and the US have signed a critical minerals deal designed to break China’s near complete hold over materials essential to commercial, clean energy and advanced military hardware.
Bahahaha. They put in “clean energy” to make it sound like America and Australia didn’t just dodge a hypersonic missile.
Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump have committed to each provide at least US$1bn ($1.54bn) towards a $US8.5bn ($13bn) pipeline of projects in both countries over the next six months to feed their commercial and defence industries..
Albanese named two ‘priority projects’ in Australia..
The first is a proposed gallium plant in Western Australia, to be co-located at one of Alcoa’s alumina refineries.
Gallium is a strategic mineral vital for modern technologies like military equipment – including in advanced electronic warfare systems such as missile guidance technology and radar.
The US is wholly dependent on gallium imports, with China having near complete dominance over its production – it is typically churned out as a byproduct by the country’s vast network of aluminium smelters.
Like much of the critical mineral supply chain, China priced out rival gallium producers over several decades until it achieved its monopoly position..
The deal aims to end China’s monopoly on rare earth production.
China is a large producer of rare earths and has near-complete control over the refining processes needed to make the minerals useful. It also produces about 90% of rare-earth magnets.
——-
This deal will likely spur minor reindustrialisation in Australia, as “building refining and processing capability for critical minerals means a greater share of trade and job creation.” Crucially, the market for said critical minerals will be America, not China.
This rather remarkable maintenance of the status quo puts to rest recent questions over Australia’s alliance with America. When Donald Trump regained the (official) Presidency, Australia was on the outer, with the focus on America’s immediate sphere of influence and on restoring America’s economy and industrial capacity.
Key to this was the reimposition of tariffs and a trade war with China. Businesses which had offshored to China were incentivised to return to America, thus as America’s industrial capacity restores, China’s will diminish.
China’s rulers rightly perceived that this gave them one of two options:
- Go to war with America in the short term.
- Fall behind America and fail to restore its status as the “Middle Kingdom” in the long term.
In this context, Australia’s rulers played a sneaky game making friendly overtures to China, with the PM making a lengthy state visit in July, and Dictator Dan appearing at China’s Victory Parade celebrations in September.
Albo also gave a major foreign policy speech in July in which he stated that “we are not shackled to our past” and “choosing our own way, doesn’t mean going it alone”.
This coded language is foreign-policy-speak for “Australia may defect to China”. With both Australia and America trending toward the demographic replacement of their native White populations due to mass immigration and “multiculturalism”, gone were the racial and cultural bonds which made us natural allies. If China became more powerful than the US, at least locally, it made sense that Australia could easily defect. I even predicted that Australia would never be invaded by China, but that the Chinese government could simply be let in by a multiracial, Marxist government.
The crucial moment came when the trade war between America and China directly targeted each other’s military capabilities. Trump escalated restrictions on the export of advanced superconductor chips and chip-making equipment to China, so the Chinese retaliated by restricting the sale to America of the critical minerals required to make them in the first place.
Until this moment, Trump had given the effete Albanese the cold shoulder. Now he needs Australia again, so a deal was struck for Australia to provide America with the critical minerals previously supplied by China.
Although it could make for some awkward moments at the upcoming APEC summit, this puts to rest any question of whether Australia will move into China’s sphere of influence, let alone be invaded. This goes much further than American military assets in Australia and our strategic position in the South Pacific.
A major war affecting sea trade, or a nuclear or EMP strike could still prove disastrous for Australians. However as Australia is now a critical pillar in the supply of raw materials for America’s military, America will prioritise Australia’s defence.
For Australian nationalists, this ends the intriguing what-if discussion regarding how we would continue to advocate for our own people should we become subject to China, either directly or indirectly.
We will continue the struggle to secure the existence of our people within the framework of an Oceania Empire which has always been at war with Eastasia.
Domestic trends continue unabated. Australia remains swamped by Asians. Only remigration will reverse our demographic obliteration, and only a nationalist government will implement remigration.
Demographic change will kill the major parties which facilitated our replacement in the first place. Labor believes it can import its voters, but it will soon fracture as different ethnic groups vie for power via their own parties. The Liberal vote is in free fall, as White/Anglo Australians search for a genuine nationalist party to represent us.
Viable options already exist and are mobilising to steer Australia back from the brink.
This article originally appeared on the XYZ and is republished by The Noticer with permission.
Header image: Albanese and Trump at the White House this month (PMO).
The post Albanese and Trump dodge a hypersonic missile first appeared on The Noticer.
The Noticer
