In an interesting case from back in the year 2000 – seems like a lifetime ago, doesn’t it? – there was an interesting and not as unusual as you might think case of a jewish criminal fleeing Israel to the Diaspora in order to get ahead of charges.
This case involved a Hasidic jewish homosexual child molester named Nachman Stal; where Stal was raping a 14 year old boy and then gave him $50 to ‘buy his silence’ – jews are invariably cheap in their bribes – only for it to then come out rather quickly and then Stal fled to Belgium in 2000 and then again in 2006 to Great Britain only to be extradited back to Israel in mid-2009 – note how quickly extradition works when it isn’t of jews from Israel to other countries – with Stal then being sentenced to 13 years in prison by an Israeli court in 2010.
We read on ‘YNet’ that:
‘Nachman Stal, who fled to Britain after being accused of sodomizing a youth of 14 years, was sentenced Sunday to 13 years behind bars.
Stal, who was extradited to Israel in July last year, received 12 years’ imprisonment for sexual offenses and an additional year for evading justice. Tel Aviv District Court also criticized rabbis who had come to Stal’s defense.
The legal proceedings began a decade ago, when Stal was accused of indecent acts with a youth he had given a lift to as part of his job. According to the indictment, Stal touched the youth a number of times, and during one particular trip he stopped the vehicle near a bench, in a quiet place, and despite the youth’s protests, sodomized him.
He then gave the youth NSI 200 ($50) and instructed him not to tell anyone. The youth finally told the rabbi of the school where he was studying. With support from this rabbi, he then submitted a complaint against Stal with the police.
In 2000, the accused fled Israel to Belgium, and the indictment was cancelled. A new indictment was submitted in 2005 when Stal returned to Israel, and one year later he again fled, this time to Britain.
The judges, headed by Judge George Kara, severely criticized the witnesses for the defense, including the wife and father of the accused, head of London’s South Tottenham Jewish community Rabbi Michael Biberfeld, and Rabbi Yosef Krauser, who supervises the yeshivas in Jerusalem’s Mea Shearim neighborhood.
The four witnesses praised Stal during the trial. “There was no problem with him,” the London rabbi said. “His actions were completely normal.” Krauser added, “I pity his wife and nine children. They say he regrets his acts and he must be helped.”
Stal’s father said his son was a wonderful person, though he had noticed a decline in his son’s behavior since 1990. His father and the defense team claimed that Stal had suffered from a brain tumor in 1997 which had affected his face and limbs.
The court noted that “all the witnesses saw the accused and his family as victims. They also tried to describe the accused as repentant. Why did none of the witnesses refer to the plaintiff, the only real victim? It would be expected of respected rabbis to say something, even if only a word, about the criminal actions of the accused. Why should they expect pity from the court when they don’t have any pity for the victim?”
The court also queried whether those same rabbis were supposed to ignore the danger to the public posed by the accused. “Is an offense against someone from outside their community not considered an offense?”
The judges also referred to Stal’s acts. “The accused took advantage of the victim’s innocence and chose him in order to carry out his deviant acts,” they wrote. “The accused tempted the victim a number of times, so that he would be easy prey.”
In addition to the penalty of imprisonment, the court ruled that Stal must pay his victim compensation of NIS 50,000 ($13,500).’ (1)
However, what is interesting is that it turns out that – just like serial jewish child molesters like Malka Leifer from Australia (2) and Rabbi Avrohom Mondrowitz from the United States – (3) Stal had powerful help from the local jewish community such as Rabbi Michael Biberfeld of South Tottenham, London. (4)
Indeed, as Marcus Dysch explains in the ‘Jewish Chronicle’; the ultra-orthodox jewish community is still openly supporting Stal despite his being a convicted homosexual child molester:
‘A strictly Orthodox community is running a fundraising campaign for a convicted child molester who avoided jail by hiding in London for two years.
Nachman Stal lived secretly among the Charedi community in Stamford Hill, north London, having fled Israel in 2006 after being found guilty of sodomy and indecent assault of a minor.
The father-of-nine lost an extradition hearing in June and is now serving his sentence in an Israeli prison.
Members of the Stamford Hill community are appealing for money to support his wife and children, who have also returned to Israel.’ (5)
So put another way jews will still support a child molester even after the child molester has been convicted by jews in a jewish court of raping a jew.
It makes you wonder what will they would support if the child concerned was a non-jew: doesn’t it?
References
(1) https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3862588,00.html
(2) On Leifer please see my article: https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/malka-leifer-jewish-lesbian-and-serial
(3) On Mondrowitz please see my article: https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/rabbi-avrohom-mondrowitz-jewish-child
(4) https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3862588,00.html
(5) https://www.thejc.com/news/charedis-raise-funds-for-rapist-dd4fk9rm
Karl’s SubstackRead More
T1
