Only remigration solves the ethnic voting bloc problem

The victory of One Nation in Farrer at the weekend was really no surprise, and while I and others are super cynical of “Save James Ashby’s Printing Business” aka One Nation, the message has clearly been sent to Canberra as pointed out by David Hiscox – close the border.

Labor pollster Kos Samaras has been doing the rounds again this week, with his usual inflammatory statements declaring Indians are the new Australians:

There is a Victorian election coming up this year, hence why he’s probably got his hands out for the polling contracts. That aside, Samaras went further on Mark Bouris’ podcast:

Still don’t believe him? Well, here it is direct from the Indian diaspora’s mouth:

And if you’re still in denial, there’s Chinese MP Jason Li saying the same thing:

“I want to replace Australians because I was bullied at school” – clearly a graduate of the Kos Samaras school of politics.

It’s not surprising how many of these people are first or second-generation migrants and absolutely resent the country their parents made a voluntary decision to move to. But when that decision is, 99% of the time, for their own economic self-interest then the end result is not so surprising.

Hence why the assimilate and integrate argument is a total joke, 99% of the time anyway.

Ethnic voting blocs are nothing new, but they never should have been “anything new”. Sure, we can’t roll back the hands of time and put Walter Lippman, Al Grassby and co in a jail cell, but we have to play the cards we now have. And the house is trying to take everything from us at the moment.

Australian politics is now just the end result of the true intention of multiculturalism – South Africanise the country so it’s politically dysfunctional internally, and as a result unable to challenge global hegemony anywhere else. At the same time, it’s being economically strip-mined globally by the same people promoting and funding it.

I’ll say again, multiculturalism hasn’t failed, it’s worked perfectly as intended.

Right now, Australia is being subjected to a week-long Royal Commission into Anti-Semitism for exactly 0.4% of the population, that already view themselves as separate to the rest of us. Having already stomached some of the publicly available viewings, it’s mainly members of the Jewish community and Israel lobby telling sob stories and inevitably asking for more money and legislative privileges.

There are many actual incisive questions that could be asked by the panel, but I would speculate many of them are intimidated and/or compromised.

There have been several early recommendations made by Virginia Bell and co sitting on the commission, however some of these have been kept secret and as usual there has been no transparency as to why.

One of the publicly available recommendations is to proceed with another gun grab, despite ironically being the 30th anniversary of Port Arthur, which still to this date has never had a Royal Commission.

I called for a Royal Commission into the Jewish lobby a few months ago, and I’ve now been backed up by Andrew Brown (the guy who was arrested for a T-shirt at Bondi). They won’t allow it, but in a sane world that’s what should happen and this topic should not be a left-right issue.

It’s not just the federal and state halls of government that are being subject to the voting bloc plague. Local councils are now under attack from waves of sectarian hordes and their appointees:

The worst current example of which being the case of Wyndham Mayor Preet Singh, who is still refusing to resign after writing a character reference for a convicted paedophile and receiving a unanimous no-confidence vote.

Australians are getting a harsh lesson that these imports do not politically play by the same high-trust principles that we generally do among ourselves, and Singh’s refusal to step aside is just endemic of the population’s naïve trust in the pluralist, liberal democracy they were raised to revere.

Gen Xers on 2GB screaming “roads, rates and rubbish” is as impotent as the “assimilate and integrate” argument. Politics on immigration is now also a local government matter, just as much as it is at the state and federal level.

The Liberal Party’s solution to all of this madness is another bullshit appeal to “Australian values”, which the regime media apparatus spent the best part of a week attempting to circle the wagons on and scream racism, with a dash of the usual migrant sob stories on top.

And this approach is why the Liberals were annihilated in Farrer. It has to be said for the millionth time, that “values” are completely unworkable nonsense, and really a copout for those who don’t want to face race realism. For those unanointed, this is what a migrant to Australia has to tick yes or no on any visa application:

“I confirm that I have read, or had explained to me, information provided by the Australian Government on Australian society and values.

I understand that Australian society values:

  • respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual;
  • freedom of religion (including the freedom not to follow a particular religion), freedom of speech, and freedom of association;
  • commitment to the rule of law, which means that all people are subject to the law and should obey it;
  • parliamentary democracy whereby our laws are determined by parliaments elected by the people, those laws being paramount and overriding any other inconsistent religious or secular “laws”;
  • equality of opportunity for all people, regardless of their gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, race, or national or ethnic origin;
  • a ‘fair go’ for all that embraces:
  • mutual respect;
  • tolerance;
  • compassion for those in need;
  • equality of opportunity for all;
  • the English language as the national language, and as an important unifying element of Australian society.

I undertake to conduct myself in accordance with these values of Australian society during my stay in Australia and to obey the laws of Australia.”

The fact that this statement is available in languages other than English is just one of many contradictions in it. If someone no longer believes any part of that, are they no longer Australian?

There are many arguments I could make to pull this whole statement apart, least of which is the fact the language it’s written in pre-supposes that anyone can be Australian, as long as you say yes to a whole bunch of nebulous, unenforceable platitudes.

This is what the centre-right is proposing and the left are melting down over. But conservatives and libertarians have been playing this stupid, cowardly game of “as long as they assimilate and integrate” or any variation thereof, for 50 years and all it has gotten us is further down the demographic totem pole.

Meanwhile, we still have Anzac statues being destroyed and Australians harassed and jailed for speaking their minds on the ongoing replacement.

The only way to prevent this situation from getting even worse than it already, is via border closure and remigration and it has to start from the local level up.

The huge gains made by Restore and Reform UK in the council elections in the UK over the weekend are encouraging, however this will soon not be traditionally achievable unless Australians organise themselves locally.

Otherwise, character references for Jeffrey Esptein’s clients written in Hindi will become the norm.

Header image: Immigration minister Tony Burke with Labor volunteers (Facebook).

The post Only remigration solves the ethnic voting bloc problem first appeared on The Noticer.

The Noticer​Read More

Author: VolkAI
This is the imported news bot.