Why We Lose and How We Will Win

This video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X.

In an earlier video, I asked viewers why they think white people are so easy to trick into thinking that they are responsible for the failures of others, especially blacks.

Also, why are whites so easy to convince they have a duty to let millions of aliens into their countries, even when so many make no secret of their contempt for us?

A big part of the answer is our evolved nature as Europeans. I believe we can be easily exploited because of the essential hallmarks of Western Civilization: Rule of law, freedom of speech, representative government, monogamy, respect for women, love of animals—and in the modern era—care for the environment. All these traits value “the other,” whether it’s the other guy, the opposite sex, other species, and in the case of the environment, living creatures not even born. You may find bits and pieces of this in other races, but they all came together only in white people.

The European concept of the rule of law means that even if I am richer and more powerful than you, I shouldn’t have more legal rights than you. Freedom of speech means I can’t shut you up no matter what you say.

Government of the people means I can’t change rules to suit myself. This is the opposite of “might makes right.” Europeans believe in rights all people must respect. It took millennia for these ideas to take form, and they emerged naturally only in Europe. Europeans never practiced them fully, but only Europeans even tried.

Chivalry is unique to Europe.

For other races, women are not much more than sex slaves and beasts of burden. For us, the other sex has rights, sometimes even superior rights.

In Europe, each man is supposed to have only one wife.

Powerful men often break the rules, but even the poor can hope to marry and have children.

We love animals. In the United States, who is arrested for dog-fighting, cock-fighting, cruelty to animals? Ghetto blacks own dogs to terrify other people.

They are disgusted by white people on their knees, hugging and even kissing dogs. For us, animals deserve our love and care.

And what is the environmentalist movement but a great celebration of the rights of all living things, even those that are 5,000 miles away and 500 years in the future?

Others have tagged along, but it’s white people who worried first and worry most about the health of the planet.

You can trust people who care about others. In the old, white America, many people never locked their doors. Farmers set out produce by the road for people to pick up and leave money.

Whites who are trusting expect others to be trustworthy, and when they’re not, it’s easy to manipulate that deep-seated white concern for “the other” into thinking that it must our fault if non-whites don’t follow our rules.

Aliens from miserable countries instinctively take advantage of our concern for “the other.”

We take them in like endangered species or lost pets. They trick us into thinking that they are poor only because we are rich, that European empires were criminal enterprises, and that the only thing the Industrial Revolution did for the rest of the world was pollute its pristine jungles and rivers.

Many people think that turn-the-other-cheek Christianity weakens us. It’s true that it is utterly unlike blood-thirsty, hyper-masculine Islam.

And it is a universalist religion, unlike Judaism, which is founded on a single people’s claim to a special relationship with God.

However, we were Christian for 1,000 years before we became what the French writer Guillaume Faye called “ethno-masochists.”

The Conquistadors were ardent Christians. So were Confederates and Southern segregationists.

The Dutch Reformed Church was one of the key architects of Apartheid in South Africa.

Christianity has been perverted, like every other institution in the West.

Some argue that our high regard for women is a snare. After Europeans invented one-man one-vote, they gave women the vote. White people foolishly pretend that the natures of men and women are the same, but of course they are not.

Women are more sympathetic towards the helpless and the weak, and single women are especially open to foreigners and refugees.

In 11 European countries, political parties have a legal requirement to field a mandatory percentage of women as candidates. In nine others, parties adopt voluntary quotas for women.

And, of course, women in politics and business have fewer children.

Not one white country has enough babies to keep its population going, and whites who are determined to ignore race pretend that Muslims and Africans will make up the shortfall.

And then there is the question of Jews. Jews are surely the most cohesive, energetic, and — per capita — the most influential people in the history of the world. Where are the other tribes of the Old Testament? The Hivites, Jebusites, Midianites, Moabites, Perizzites, Amorites, Amalekites, Edomites, Philistines, and all the others I can’t even remember? Gone without a trace. But the Jews? Three thousand years later, they’re still going strong, and most of that time, they didn’t even have a country of their own.

In the United States, their disproportionate influence is obvious in media, Hollywood, universities, finance, politics, and they have used their power for Jewish ends, most obviously to support Israel. This explains why our legislators, who would slit their wrists rather than say France should be for the French, give standing ovations to the head of a Jewish state where ethnic coherence is national policy number one.

Jews have, without a doubt, been pioneers in every movement that undermines white solidarity and even survival: integration, immigration, white guilt, white privilege, DEI, feminism, and the pretense that race is an illusion.

However, by no means are all Jews enemies of our race. My earlier video was about the suicidal refusal of whites to understand race differences. And yet many of the great pioneers in this field have been Jews: Hans Eysenck, Daniel Seligman, Richard Herrnstein, Mark Snyderman, Michael Levin, Stanley Rothman, Seymour Itzkoff.

Who seems to have the clearest, most consistent understanding of race in the Trump White House? Stephen Miller, who is Jewish.

Many Jews are waking up to the fact that the WASP America they helped pull down was the best thing to happen to them since Moses.

Jews like cities. You think they don’t know who wrecked them?

As one of my Jewish friends says “A lot of Jews think just like white advocates, but it’s hard to make common cause with people who want to kill you.”

Our race is in a fight for its life; we need all the friends we can get — and some may come from unexpected quarters. At the same time, we should know who is leading us astray, who may be speaking as a white American but whose goals are not the same as ours. We can put our case more skillfully and better protect our interests if we understand the motives of others.

However, when Joe Sixpack finally wonders why every motel in America is owned by Indians, it won’t make much difference to him if you explain that Jewish groups campaigned for decades to end the immigration policy that kept America white.

Would our race be less frantically on the road to suicide without the influence of Jews? Yes. But plenty of our own people have rushed unbidden down that road. There are very few Jewish fingerprints on that insane orgy of egalitarian violence we call the French Revolution.

Many American abolitionists wanted not just freedom for blacks but miscegenation: William Lloyd Garrison, Theodore Dwight Weld, the Grimke sisters, John Brown and his backers.

Others privately favored intermarriage but were too afraid to shout about it. No Jews in that crowd.

It’s the same for the very first mass movement in American history—the petition to Congress to stop Andrew Jackson’s plan for Indian removal. Catherine Beecher stirred up thousands of white Christian women to weep for the Red Man.

We have plenty of crazies. Our powerful instinct for fairness, which is a strength within our own tribe, is easily perverted by the overexcited within our own ranks — and easily manipulated by others.

Ultimately, this is our fight. We must rely on our own strengths, even as we work to correct our weaknesses.

We would be a more resilient people if we could laugh off appeals to conscience, if we were deaf to cries for fairness, if we were like other races and put our interests first without apology, if we were more tribal and less individualistic. But we would be a different people.

We are men and women of Europe. We are born with a nature we cannot and should not deny.

In that nature, there are deep resources that are good, manly, virtuous, generous, courageous, honorable. When we call on what is best in our nature, we are invincible, and that is how we will prevail.

The post Why We Lose and How We Will Win appeared first on American Renaissance.

American Renaissance

​Read More